25-1032.00

Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary

Teach courses pertaining to the application of physical laws and principles of engineering for the development of machines, materials, instruments, processes, and services. Includes teachers of subjects such as chemical, civil, electrical, industrial, mechanical, mineral, and petroleum engineering. Includes both teachers primarily engaged in teaching and those who do a combination of teaching and research.

2.5OUT OF 10SAFEHIGH RISK
Low Risk

Your job is remarkably safe from AI

Safer than 25% of occupations we track

Frey & Osborne (2013) estimated 50% probability of automation for this role
paper →
25%
of jobs safer
763
jobs riskier than this
+8.1%
projected growth

Disruption Vector

Disruption Type

Human-Centric

This occupation relies heavily on human judgment, empathy, creativity, or physical dexterity that remains beyond current AI capabilities.

Engineering Teachers at the postsecondary level face a teaching environment transformed by GitHub Copilot and AI coding assistants, forcing curriculum redesign around AI-augmented engineering practice. AI tutoring systems (Khanmigo, Synthesis) can provide personalized problem-solving feedback at scale. However, the mentorship of student engineering projects, the development of intuition and professional judgment, and the research supervision that defines a strong engineering faculty role remain human. The 2025-2027 outlook involves significant pedagogical change rather than role elimination.

Augmented byAI augmentation tools

Salary & Job Outlook

Median Annual Pay
$106,120
US Bureau of Labor Statistics
10-Year Job Growth
+8.1%
Faster than average
Education Required
Doctoral or professional degree
Job Zone 5 / 5

AI Risk Timeline

2.5
2.8
3.1
3.7
Today
5 Years
10 Years
20 Years

Projection model: Based on current AI capability growth rates. High-risk occupations are projected to see compounding automation pressure, while human-centric roles show slower risk accumulation. These are statistical projections, not guarantees.

Skills Analysis — AI Vulnerability

AI can replicate (0)
AI-resistant (1)
Mixed
Critical Thinking80%
Active Learning75%
Complex Problem Solving78%
Judgment and Decision Making82%
Reading Comprehension72%

Similar Safe Careers

Share Your Results

amicooked-five.vercel.app

Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary

2.5
/ 10
Low Risk
25% automation risk

"AI tried to grade the awkward silence in your classroom. It failed."

Tweet preview

I just checked if I'm cooked as a Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary 🤖 AI risk score: 2.5/10 — Low Risk "AI tried to grade the awkward silence in your classroom. It failed." Check yours 👇 https://amicooked-five.vercel.app/results/25-1032.00 #AmICooked #AI #FutureOfWork

Your score badge

AM I COOKED?

ENGINEERING TEACHERS, POSTSECONDARY
2.5

/ 10

LOW RISK

amicooked-five.vercel.app

Screenshot this card to share on Instagram or TikTok 📸

You're safer than 25% of all knowledge workers we track.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and is based on statistical models and academic research. It does not constitute career advice and is not a guarantee of future employment outcomes. AI impact varies significantly by employer, region, and individual circumstances. Learn about our methodology →